In November 2001, a boy who followed the Sikh faith dropped his ceremonial kirpan thorn in a Montreal inculcate yard. The school board was contacted closely the incident and proceeded to impose a board-wide ban on the kirpan. The school board ban was overturned by the Quebec Superior dally, and then upheld by the Quebec Court of Appeal. The case was appealed to the domineering Court of Canada (SCC) which held that the ban was in violation of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The SCC located that in the case of Multani v. Commision Scolaire marguerite daisy ?Bourgouys, the ban on the kirpan, as a symbol of religious expression, was not found to be conceivable or justifiable as required by Section 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, but mainly because the school board ban on kirpans violated the individuals dependable to freedom of Religion under Section 2 of the Charter.
Firstly, the Supreme Court of Canada, in their ruling on the case of Multani v. Commision Scolaire Marguerite ?Bourgouys, found that the school-board imposed ban on kirpans , was not apt or justifiable as required by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Marguerite ?Bourgouys nurture Board failed to establish that kirpans were a dangerous weapon or that they posed a curse to other students and the S.C.C.
also decided that the ban was not reasonable because it was possible to accommodate the kirpan easily without a ban. At trial, the School Board first attempted to prove that school safe concerns outweighed the violation of religious freedom [the kirpan ban].The school board argued that allowing the kirpan in school would ?lead to a proliferation of weapons? in school, and have a ?negative impact? on the school environement. The SCC did recognize that it was possible...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper