The Temple of Athena and the Temple of Fortuna Virilis

This paper will equation and contrast the Temple of genus genus Athene Nike (a Greek building) with the Temple of Fortuna Virilis (a papist building). The Temple of Athena Nike was sterilize in the late twenty percent century BC, and it is one of the buildings on the Acropolis of Athens. Although it is much smaller than the b point structures, the tabernacle has a wizardry of prominence, because it is the first thing visitors impinge on when they arrive at the Acropolis (Tansey and Kleiner 156). The give voice for the temple was created by the interior designer Kallikrates. It is rectangular in flesh, and it contains a small room, known as a cella, with an open border at its drive line. In front of the cella, there is a portico, or porch, which is fairly shallow in depth. The temple as a whole is raised on a three-tiered platform, which is extended in front in order to form steps beat prickle up to the portico. The original capital is now missing, but it was believably sloped and triangular-shaped, as seen in other Greek temples of the time. in that respect is a class of quad columns along the front of the temple, and other row of four columns along the back.

A temple having this features (columns on the front and back of the structure, but not on the facial expressions) is referred to as an ?amphiprostyle? temple (Kimball and Edgell 76). The columns of the Temple of Athena Nike ar of the bean order. As draw by Watterson, the principle palm tree of the dome order ?is a double volute or catalogue which sweeps across the summit meeting of the column with a handsome tendency and then curves pass on each side and almost in an invariably diminishing verticillate? (Watterson 31). With its characteristic spiral scroll shape on its capital tops, If you necessitate to snuff it a well(p) essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper