Was autocracy in the middle ages better or worse than the democracy we live in today?

Introduction.

Australian democracy is a fairer system of government than the autocracy of chivalric time Discuss. A topic that has the ability to spring people question their own government. Is it true, was it really better animation with the autocracy of medieval times, or is todays government more gentle to all people living in our society?

In the Australian democratic system everyone frig arounds a say.

A government is put into violence by receiving votes in an election, thus, before the election, they must be best-selling(predicate) and appeal to the public, and if the public disagree with their ideas of development you can pronounce up, and say what you believe in. The policies in which they plan to bring into way out must be announced, if not proclaimed, they would be breaking the law. The media ar not controlled by the government and can say things against them, insalubrious or good, therefore, the media can present the public with information, explaining the government in terms that the public can relate to.

Because of the Australian democratic system women are treated equally.

As a result of the Australian democratic system, women have the right to vote in an election.



irrelevant medieval autocracy, living under our constitution, it is illegal to discriminate against women and we today recognise the value of women as a role of a mother and equal pay for equal work.

Unlike the autocracy of medieval times, the Australian democratic system allows freedom of speech.

The media can scrape a story, even if it is against the government, and this is often the case, this also makes it easier for the public to get a realistic view and the reality of the system. We have a constitutional right to say what we think and allow us to state our views and...

If you want to get a full essay, array it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper