'Puck: Character Analysis Essay\r'

'hockey puck\r\nOne of the around interesting personalitys in Shakespe be’s play, summer solstice darkness’s Dream, is hockey puck. hockey puck’s whimsical spirit, magical fancy, fun-loving humor, and lovely, evocative vocabulary permeate the atmosphere of the play. Being brought to the interview’s attention when lending out Oberon’s orders, puck is often overlooked in relation to the attention granted to other events occurring in all(prenominal) plot. hockey puck is servant and jester to the Fairy King Oberon and it is his magical spell and enchant manpowert that serves useful to him and withal Oberon. He is poised tho non as sugary as the other fairies; as Oberon’s jester, he is given to a certain roughness, which leads him to trans throw empennage’s head into that of an ass merely for the interestingness of enjoyment. Being a fairy of a noisome temper is what leads Puck into triggering more of the memorable momen ts in the play. It is because of Puck’s many diametric character tendencies, along with his ever present mischievous nature that it is possible to analyze his character in three different miens.\r\nThe first sort to analyze Puck is through his avouch eyes. A fairy many be the simplest way to describe Puck save he knows he is seen well as a goblin, or a zoology of chaos. Agreeing that the previous would more accurately assure his description, Puck knows that he is given over to possibility and cruel further devout-hearted tricks. keen that Puck is a mischief shaper and creator of chaos, Oberon still relies on him to carry out his orders that way he intends for them to happen. To puck chaos is correct, and it is that chaos that Oberon secretly relies on.\r\nWhen Oberon sends Puck to Titania and her lover, Bottom, it easily foreseen before Puck even arrives that something unfortunate would soon traverse Titania’s evening. Here Puck’s lighthearted, i n time cruel hanky panky gets the best of him where he could not yet help himself in routine Bottom’s head into that of an ass. Also, without his wit, creativity, and trickery, Puck would not have been able to trick the finite men into chasing him. Puck is able wholly then to lead the mortal men far into the forest where eventually they some(prenominal) tire and fall asleep. Puck knows that his mischievous nature is more than dear his entertainment, but that it is also his greatest strength that proves to be useful to his master, Oberon, himself, and also the interview.\r\nA mo way to view Puck is as a bringer of love, a Cupid of some sort. Although the c at a timeit of the love spell was Oberon’s, he delegates the project to Puck. The mortals are not important comme il faut for him to take care of himself and so he delegates this responsibility to puck, acting almost as Hermes to Zeus. As previously stated, Puck is fun-loving and pr superstar to unfortunate mistakes and with this in Oberon’s all-encompassing knowledge Puck is still given the visor with the power of love. After receiving the flower Puck sets off with the best of spirit but his personality wins out.\r\nUpon seeing the mortals deceit sleeping, Puck confuses which mortal man he is to put the spell on and chooses the revile one. Creating havoc rather than love, when the mortals wake up Puck realizes what he has done and divert and to some degree pleased, he does not get in any urge to place the mistake. He is not sorry, nor does he panic at the thought of Oberon finding out his mistake. Puck instead, blames the misfortune on the lover’s own foolishness. non having done the work himself the first time, Oberon once again must entrust Puck to undo his mistake. Even after turning the young lover’s arena upside down, it is Puck who is sent to reclaim order and set things right betwixt the lovers, ensuring the play’s happy ending.\r\nIn ma ny of Shakespeare’s play on that point is a character whose main routine is informing the audience of the important aspects of the past, the present, and the prospective action of the play. These characters are known as the utter and are prevalent in many of Shakespeare’s dramas. This is third way to view Puck’s character. sometimes the events taking place are still discussed by the chorus, and other times the chorus seems to make predictions that lead the audience to digest the event. More often than not though, a twist ending is what the audience unremarkably comes to accept. As the chorus, Puck not notwithstanding directs the drama of A Midsummer Night’s Dream but brings the audience along with him. He keeps them updated on what has happened and what is happening throughout the play. Given that there are two plots, Puck pulls off the occupation of narrator and fairy guide effortlessly as he ensures that no one gets lost as the two plots perpe tually weave in and out of each other.\r\nTo decide between these three different personalities as to which Puck would more well fit would be interesting and yet near impossible. It is only when the three personalities are combined that the real exploration and abbreviation of Puck’s true character can begin. Chaos is usually looked at as a derogatory term, but there can be in effect(p) and bad chaos. Puck is exactly that, good and bad chaos. In fact, one could affirm Puck almost perfectly straddles the drag between tranquility and chaos in that when it comes to his many unfortunate events, one gets mend usually before more situations arise. Depending on the recipient of his work, Puck is not evil, just playful enough to cause problems and also smart enough to go O.K. and help undo or fix the multitude of problems he causes throughout the play. Shakespeare’s inclusion of Puck as the form of knowledge shows that there is more to Puck’s character than just a mischievous hobgoblin you see at first glance. His character plays an important, if not major, economic consumption in the process of telling the study of A Midsummer Night’s Dream. Puck is not to be undermined as just a jokster fairy, but silent in his own right.\r\n'